Limited Liability Partnerships
Mr. Mitchell: To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry
what restrictions he proposes
to place on limited companies re-incorporating as limited liability
partnerships. [125427]
Dr. Howells: Part II of the Companies Act 1985 provides a mechanism
by which a company may
alter its status by way of re-registration. There is no similar provision
in the Limited Liability
Partnerships Bill.
If, therefore, the members of a limited company decide that they wish
to cease to trade through
their current vehicle--the limited company--and to commence trading
through a limited liability
partnership, they will have to go through a three stage process. First,
they will have to set up the
limited liability partnership complying with the conditions set out
in the LLP Bill and regulations.
Second, they will have to transfer the assets and liabilities of the
company to the LLP. This may
give rise to transaction and taxation charges; the LLP Bill and regulations
do not provide any tax
exemptions for such a transfer, nor do they facilitate the transfer
in any other way, e.g. by
providing for an automatic transfer of assets. Finally, the members
of the company would either
have to keep the company in being in parallel to the LLP, and so continue
to comply with the
regulatory requirements set out in the Companies Act 1985, or they
would need to seek to wind
up the company by a members' voluntary winding up.
Mr. Mitchell: To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry
what estimates he has made
of the number of public and private limited companies likely to re-incorporate
as limited liability
partnerships as a result of the provisions of the Limited Liability
Partnerships Bill [Lords]; and
what consultations he has had with the Treasury about the tax revenue
consequences of such
changes. [125429]
Dr. Howells: No estimates have been made. I would refer my hon.
Friend to replies to two of his
earlier written questions. The first is my reply on 9 June 2000, Official
Report, column 385W to
his question asking what estimate had been made of the number of plcs
likely to register as limited
liability partnerships which gave the reasons why we would be surprised
if plcs converted to
LLPs. The second is the reply made by my hon. Friend the Paymaster
General on 5 June 2000,
Official Report, column 77W, to the question asking the Chancellor
of the Exchequer what
consultations he has had with the DTI on this subject. My hon. Friend
the Paymaster General
confirmed that officials at the DTI have been in close contact with
Inland Revenue officials, and
went on to note that because of the possibility that some LLPs might
be set up solely because of
their taxation of LLPs. Depending on what this work finds, consideration
will be given to bringing
forward further tax legislation in due course.